Power of Nightmares Part 1

The cultural myths that last through decades in society are usually the ones that become known as “truth.”

 “Power of Nightmares Part 1” pointed out systematic fear, coupled with a colonial “good vs. evil” mantra, as arguably the most effective tactic for political leaders to use in controlling the masses. What is striking is that logically, a community mentality and group effort produce significantly more societal change than individualistic values. But starting in the middle of the 20^th century, leaders began to realize the power of channeling fear into the hearts and minds of its citizens. Especially in America, citizens were encouraged to believe that their nation had a unique destiny: to fight the evils of the world. The pride people felt for their country now stemmed from conquering evil, which in turn undermined a shared effort. The myth of fear and colonialism as means of fulfilling one’s civic duties was born. It still flourishes today.

This film had a lot of strong points in illustrating these messages, but it was also very puzzling. It was unclear as to why images from Egypt were being juxtaposed with images from America. The most effective sections of the film were the ones presented most clearly. Since I already have familiarity with American politics, especially Rumsfeld and his blatant lies, I found the footage and discussion of America most engaging. The parts about the Middle East and Egypt were bewildering. There was one scene in which the people of these countries were shown screaming and out of control. The narrator explained that people regressed into a “state of barbarous ignorance” when they were blindly being controlled, and the whole reference was confusing because the words did not exactly sync up with the images. 

Near the end of the film, Neo-conservatives came on to discuss how they feel their role has shifted to now act as “Democratic Revolutionists.” This part of the film summed up some major points, because the men truly believed that their calling in life was to conquer evils of the world, as Americans know best and need to spread the message of freedom. It showed that the myth that Strauss first presented to the political world long ago, centered around a sort of fantasy land in which one must assume that they are going to be attacked, still thrives. More chilling, it is believed.